Showing posts with label technology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label technology. Show all posts

29 August 2011

Why I don't use my iPhone as a personal organizer

My husband is a bit of a techie. He loves gadgets and seeing how games and technology develops. He listens to gadget/tech podcasts and loves his iPhone and iPad. When I tell him about an upcoming appointment or event, he tells me to email or text him with the details, and he puts it in his phone's calendar or on Google Calendar. We don't have a family calendar on the wall at home because there's no point.

Hubby has often urged me to use an electronic calendar on my phone or online to keep track of everything. He argues that I could figure out my schedule, add article and project deadlines, and update it quickly and easily as things change. I could even keep my daily task lists on my phone!

Yes, that's true. But I will always and forever use a paper day planner for my scheduling and bound notebooks for my task lists. I will always and forever scribble appointments and article deadlines in the squares of my paper day planners. I will always and forever cross off tasks as I complete them, a black line through the middle of the writing.

And here's why.

If I don't write things down, I have a hard time remembering them. Appointments, tasks that need to be done, anything. I have to write them down. So by having physical day planners and task list notebooks, I can physically write things down, and I can be sure they'll get done.

On top of that, what do I do if the network goes down? Or my phone battery dies? With paper and pen, I always have access to what I need to do, even if the technological gods are against me.

I can see how using Google Calendar or your phone's organizer is helpful, especially if you're on the go a lot. But I'll stick with my Luddite organization techniques, thank you. And when the Internet goes down, I'll still be waiting at the coffee shop for our lunch date.

18 July 2009

Technology Continues to Bring Debates

With the increasing popularity of e-books, publishing houses are being forced to adapt to keep up, and discuss issues in the publishing world that have not been debated until now.

And, of course, the question is not simply whether to make digital copies of books available, but how to handle their releases in relation to paper and ink copies (particularly hardcover).

In this recent article by The New York Times, Mikoto Rich and Brad Stone say:

No topic is more hotly debated in book circles at the moment than the timing, pricing and ultimate impact of e-books on the financial health of publishers and retailers. Publishers are grappling with e-book release dates partly because they are trying to understand how digital editions affect demand for hardcover books. A hardcover typically sells for anywhere from $25 to $35, while the most common price for an e-book has quickly become $9.99.

Of course, price isn't the only factor in the apprehension of publishers to set release dates for their digital publications. "Leaks" are an issue, as well. The article goes on to say:

Ms. [Susanne] Herz said that Doubleday was primarily worried about the security of Mr. [Dan] Brown’s book, [The Lost Symbol,] which is being kept under a strict embargo until the Sept. 15 publication date. But she acknowledged that the e-book’s possible effect on hardcover sales was also an issue, among others.

This is a key transitional time for the publishing industry, and the decisions that publishers make now will have lasting effects.

So what do you think? How should publishing houses handle the release of digital books in relation to their paper and ink cousins?

12 December 2008

Your Friendly Neighborhood...Ironman?

I know my blog usually focuses on things of a writerly nature with a sprinkling of caffeinated sweetness for good measure, but when I saw this, I decided to take a step in the Sunday Sensational Science direction to share this with you.

Since I'm not really science-y, I'll just let the video speak for itself.  Enjoy!



P.S. I want one.